Vice President Joe Biden: “They talk about this Great Recession if it fell out of the sky, like, ‘Oh, my goodness, where did it come from?’ It came from this man voting to put two wars on a credit card, to at the same time put a prescription drug benefit on the credit card, a trillion-dollar tax cut for the very wealthy. I was there. I voted against them. I said, no, we can’t afford that.”
During his Oct. 11 debate with Rep. Paul Ryan, Biden blamed the recession on deficit spending for the Afghanistan and Iraq wars along with the prescription drug benefit plan and the Bush tax cuts. Two parts of the claim withstand scrutiny: Biden did not vote for the prescription drug plan or the Bush tax cuts.
The recession very probably did not result from any combination of wars, prescription drug benefits or tax cuts. The recession stemmed primarily from the burst of a housing bubble that inflated over a prolonged period as well as from reliance in the financial sector on investments tied to home mortgage.
Biden voted in favor of the measures giving congressional permission for wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Biden voted against the prescription drug benefit plan signed by President Bush. He likewise opposed the Bush tax cuts.
The largest growth of the federal deficit as a percentage of GDP started with the steep loss in revenue associated with the recession.
The experts tend to focus on various aspects of monetary policy in fixing blame for the “Great Recession.” Biden’s summary reflects nothing of the mainstream view. It’s either false or an extreme exaggeration to claim the cited Bush policies created the recession.
Analyzing the Rhetoric
Every communicator deserves charitable interpretation, Biden no less than anybody else. The vice president’s argument closely matches the pattern of a common liberal argument for blaming the deficit on the Bush administration. Because the literal meaning makes so little sense in comparison, it makes sense to conclude that Biden misspoke. He probably intended to fix blame for the deficit, not the recession.
Using a charitable interpretation on Biden’s statement results in a completely different fact check: Did two wars, tax cuts and a new Medicare prescription drug benefit cause the budget deficit problem?
The CBO chart above helps place the charge in context, showing as it does a shrinking deficit near 2005 with all the supposed causes of the deficit in full effect. That chart suggests that revenue lost to the recession contributed significantly to the deficit.
Issue settled? Is Biden right? It’s not as easy as that. The chart makes the deficit look almost flat without the Bush policies, but Medicare and Medicaid are two of the biggest drivers of the federal deficit. The CBPP chart serves an agenda.
Reasons to discount the chart at face value:
- The chart assumes “new funding will be provided for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.”
- The chart uses the static scoring of the Congressional Budget Office to gauge the effect of the Bush tax cuts.
- The chart arbitrarily figures in “debt service costs” for each category of expense. Using that method we could replace any category of deficit spending with “Medicaid” and obtain an even scarier chart.
Unlike the debt, the deficit is new every year. If Biden wants to take credit for renewing, favoring and making permanent the Bush tax cuts for middle-income Americans then he has to shoulder some of the responsibility for lost revenue and a rising deficit. By the same token, the deficit was shrinking year by year until the recession stifled tax revenue. The spike in the deficit for fiscal 2009 mostly occurred based on that revenue loss plus the cost of TARP and other bailout loans. So, yes, the deficit “fell out of the sky” based on those two factors. Subsequent budgets should benefit from increased tax revenues as the economy recovers as well as from repayment of the loans that added so much to the deficit in 2009.
Biden deserves a break on the charge that he’s claiming to have voted against the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. It’s reasonable to interpret him to mean he did not favor using deficit spending to finance the wars, though that implies that Biden favored some sort of tax increase during the recession of the early 2000s.
In short, blaming present-day federal budget deficits on Bush just doesn’t work very well. Taken charitably, Biden’s statement is little more than blame-shifting with a meager basis in fact. Bush’s policies did increase the deficit and the debt. President Obama continued to add to both, with more recent appearances of a sizable decrease in the federal deficit relying largely on the comparison with an atypical FY 2009 and a congressional budget deal.
“2012 vice-presidential debate: Vice President Biden and Rep. Paul Ryan’s remarks in Danville, Ky., on Oct.11 (running transcript).” The Washington Post. 11 Oct. 2012. Web. 14 Oct. 2012.
Domitrovic, Brian. “The Weak Dollar Caused the Great Recession.” Forbes, 13 Mar. 2012. Web. 13 Oct. 2012.
Weisberg, Jacob. “What Caused the Economic Crisis?” Slate, 9 Jan. 2010. Web. 13 Oct. 2012.
Verick, Sher and Iyanatul Islam. “The Great Recession of 2008-2009: Causes, Consequences and Policy Responses.” Social Science Research Network. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4934. 29 Jun. 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1631069.
Stiglitz, Joseph E. “Interpreting the Causes of the Great Recession of 2008.” [Abstract]. Initiative for Policy Dialogue, n.d. Web. 13 Oct. 2012.
Ruffing, Kathy and James R. Horney. “Critics Still Wrong on What’s Driving Deficits in Coming Years.” Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 28 Jun. 2010. Web.
13 Oct. 2012.
“Long Run Growth of Medicare and Medicaid Spending.” Tax Policy Center, n.d. Web. 13 Oct. 2012.
“Medicaid Spending Growth Over the Last Decade and the Great Recession, 2000 – 2009.” The Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured. Publication #8152. 23 Jun. 2011. Web. 13 Oct. 2012.
Kliff, Sarah. “The feds’ big Medicaid spend, in one chart.” Ezra Klein’s Wonkblog. The Washington Post, 6 Dec. 2011. Web. 13 Oct. 2012.