An independent experimental fact-checking site, exploring and advocating ways to make fact-checking better.
To help pursue the aim of educating readers about the workings of logic and rhetoric and to help make the rating system less daunting and mysterious, we’ve updated the rating system page to include an example of each icon we might use. When we add a new icon we’ll add the image to the rating system page. Each of the…
Read more
“45,007,000 seniors would be forced out of traditional Medicare and into a voucher program.” —Democratic Policy & Communications Center Overview Democrats’ evaluation of new Ryan budget uses language that leaves a misleading impression. The Facts The statement drawing our focus occurs right off the bat in the Democratic Policy & Communication Center’s official evaluation of the newest version of…
Read more
“I mean, you just heard it. There is no ratio of spending cuts to revenue increases that Republicans will accept.” —David Gregory, host of NBC’s “Meet the Press” Foreword We’re aware of our relatively tight focus on budget deal rhetoric. This item struck us because a major news media figure (Gregory) beautifully parroted the gist of the administration’s budget…
Read more
“The President has put forward a proposal that will be reflected in his budget and the principles will be reflected in his budget. And that proposal, as you know, because you covered it, that he made to the Speaker of the House demonstrated his willingness to find common ground with the Republicans on both revenue and entitlement cuts, demonstrated his…
Read more
We’re adding a new icon to our ratings arsenal. We use fallacy icons and descriptions from yourlogicalfallacyis.com because that site did a great deal of good work designing fallacy icons—work we’d have ended up doing otherwise. Yourlogicalfallacyis.com also provides simplified descriptions of the fallacies well-suited to readers new to analyzing rhetoric in terms of logic. We use a variety of…
Read more
“It is the President’s position that in pursuit of balanced deficit reduction that includes both entitlement reforms and revenues from tax reform, that the offer he made to Speaker Boehner remains on the table, and that if the Speaker of the House were to change his position and go back to the position he held just a few months ago,…
Read more
“At Hobby Lobby alone, the care of thousands of women in 42 states is at risk. And if the courts side with them, that means millions of women face losing basic health coverage.” —Stephanie Schriock, EMILY’s List Overview An email from Stephanie Schriock, president of EMILY’s List, uses technically true statements to serially exaggerate the potential effects of the…
Read more
We ran across a quotation attributed to noted Supreme Court justice Louis D. Brandeis. Curious about the context more than suspicious of its authenticity, we tried to find the source. The quotation ended up having a number of variants. “We may have a democracy or we may have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we cannot…
Read more
“I know that this has been some of the conventional wisdom that’s been floating around Washington that somehow, even though most people agree that I’m being reasonable, that most people agree I’m presenting a fair deal, the fact that they don’t take it means that I should somehow do a Jedi mind-meld with these folks and convince them to do…
Read more
“The entire DNA of the enforcement mechanism in the sequester was to bring both sides back on the table. The Democrats would compromise more in entitlements, that Republicans would compromise more on revenue. So the idea that this moves the goalposts is just—I mean, there’s not even an ounce of—there’s not even an ounce of truth to that.” —Gene Sperling,…
Read more